π§♀️ TREE HOUSE NEWS π‘
NEWS AGGREGATOR & COMMENTS
Catigory - SPACE:
Why doesn't SpaceX land Starship on the ground instead of the ocean? Isn't that a waste?
Have you wondered why Elon Musk's SpaceX Texas Base is not bringing back the Starship, or payload or second stage, part of the two stage rocket back down to solid ground like the first stage or booster? After all, it is the most important part of the ship if it is going to transport humans.
It's ok to transport satellites and other equipment and heavy payloads into space, but why waste all of the delivery part of the ship just disposing of it in the ocean? It seems they can land the launcher, which is much larger, bulkier, and heavier than the second stage, Starship, which is much smaller than the launcher and much lighter coming back after delivery in space and being quite capable of maneuvering coming through the atmosphere after delivering the payload as it comes back down through the atmosphere. It doesn't make sense to waste all that hardware, electronics, rocketry, and other expensive alloys metals and other matrials used in it’s construction with the shell of a giant stainless-steel spaceship.
And if he can't return the most important part of the ship to Earth, then what good is it? I am beginning to believe I will not see man go any further than the space station in my lifetime, and even that has a time limit of 2030.
It also doesn't appear like our other Rocket Scientist, Jeff Bezos of Blue Origin, has come up with anything indicating progress with his part of NASA’s Artemis program. I haven’t heard anything about him being ready to send anything up, either. His lips seem to be sealed like a tight-lipped clam. It doesn't appear like he's anywhere near sending peeps to the Moon , let alone Mars.
- Google Search -
Question: Why doesn't SpaceX land Starship on the ground instead of the ocean? Isn't that a waste?
πΉAI Overview
SpaceX does not land Starship on the ground immediately because it is still in testing. While it seems wasteful, landing in the ocean is a deliberate, strategic choice to maximize safety, refine technology without destroying infrastructure, and maximize payload capacity during development.
Read More:
The long-term goal is to catch both the Super Heavy booster and the Starship upper stage using the launch tower ("Mechazilla") at the launch site, but this requires extreme precision that is still being tested.
- Here is why SpaceX currently uses ocean landings:
Safety and Risk Management: Landing a massive, 50-meter-tall ship is incredibly dangerous. If a landing goes wrong, it is far safer for the rocket to crash into the ocean than to explode on land, destroying the launch pad, injuring personnel, or damaging nearby infrastructure.
Testing Limits: SpaceX uses these water landings to push the vehicle to the limit, learning how it handles re-entry and landing maneuvers.
• Fuel Efficiency and Payload: Returning to the landing pad requires a "boost-back" burn, which consumes a massive amount of fuel. More:
• Technical Challenge: Landing on solid ground requires the rocket to hover, which is difficult. Water acts as a cushion. More:
• Avoiding Landing Legs: Landing legs would reduce the payload it can carry to orbit. More:
Isn't it a waste?:
SpaceX's ultimate goal is full reusability, but during testing, destroying a prototype in the ocean is considered a necessary cost of learning. SpaceX has already proven it can successfully land and reuse the smaller Falcon 9 rockets; the same principles are being applied to Starship, which has to deal with much higher energy, making the testing process more complex.
________________________
'Pushing this competition': SpaceX's Starship might not fly on NASA's newly revamped Artemis 3 mission
"NASA does not want to have to rely on only one contractor."
Artemis II Flight Readiness Polls Go to Proceed Toward April Launch
- Nasa-gov - March 12, 2026 4:36PM
'Pushing this competition': SpaceX's Starship might not fly on NASA's newly revamped Artemis 3 mission
________________________
News:
"NASA does not want to have to rely on only one one contractor."
New Mission:
NASA's Artemis 3 mission will no longer land astronauts on the moon — and it might not involve SpaceX's Starship megarocket, either.
On Friday (Feb. 27), the space agency announced that it's revamping the architecture of its Artemis program of lunar exploration.
NASA's new plan launches Artemis 3 in 2027 but keeps it in low Earth orbit.
The mission will aim to demonstrate a range of technologies and capabilities there, including a rendezvous and docking procedure between the Orion crew capsule and "one or both commercial landers from SpaceX and Blue Origin," agency officials said in a statement on Friday...
Read More:
- Space-com -
Published February 28, 2026
After spending all this time since last night researching this, I would say we have a bit of a mix-up in the meanings of debauchery and disorder, and I wouldn't be surprised if someone's wallet is being held hostage. Maybe NASA's wallet is getting some prodding by the can full of flesh-eating worms π₯«πͺ±πͺ±πͺ± from the Great Brown π© House π on the hill ⛰️
BREAKING NEWS:
Two weeks of war: Inside Trump’s risky decision to attack Iran — and the scramble to contain the fallout
President Donald Trump’s war with Iran was only hours old, and already the plan had gone awry.
Spurred by fresh intelligence that the country’s 86-year-old supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, was meeting with his top officials on the morning of Feb. 28, the US and Israel had accelerated plans for an attack in hopes of wiping out the regime’s senior leadership all at once. If it worked, officials calculated, the resulting power vacuum could be filled by a slate of lower-tier leaders they hoped would be open to ushering in a more US-friendly era in Iran.
The first strikes on targets across the country succeeded in killing Khamenei and other high-ranking aides. Yet as early reports trickled in, it became clear they’d created a new problem: All the candidates the administration had eyed to lead Iran had been wiped out too...
MAP Included: Locations in and around Tehran hit by strikes since Feb. 28
- Emboldened by prior strikes:
- ‘Shock and awe times 10’:
- ‘Depart now’:
MAP Included: Strikes across the Middle East
- The biggest ‘I told you so’:
- ‘They’re all over the map’:
- ‘We haven’t won enough’:
- The costly oil fallout:
More to Read:
PUBLISHED Mar 14, 2026, 6:01 AM ET - 4 hr ago
- CNN -
CANADIAN NEWS:
He thought he followed all the rules. Then border guards arrested him on the street
Youth mental health worker forced to leave Canada despite pleas from hospital staff
Just weeks ago, Dillon Nolan was envisioning a new chapter of his life in Canada. He married his partner, Dylan Fox, on Valentine’s Day and was, by all accounts, excelling at his job as a social worker specializing in youth mental health at B.C. Children’s Hospital.
Canadian man stuck in ICE detention centre for 4 months, awaiting deportation hearing A couple of weeks later, he was arrested and handcuffed outside a music venue in Vancouver's Gastown where he was about to perform, detained in an immigration holding centre and ordered to leave the country "I was so upset. I was so shocked," Nolan said. "I didn't really know what happened or why."...
WATCH | Youth mental health worker forced to leave Canada:
- Never received letter:
- 'It was so shocking':
- 'I did not think that this could happen':
• The Canada Border Services Agency said in a statement it could not comment on the specifics of Nolan's detention due to privacy.
• The statement also said that visa overstay and misrepresentation could both result in a removal order that the agency would act to enforce.
• IRCC did not respond to CBC's questions by deadline.
Read More:
Posted: Mar 14, 2026 7:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 1 hour ago
- CBC -
CANADAπ: Let us pray π, and please do not forget to write to your member of Parliament.
- Google Search -
πΉAI Overview
Email your Member of Parliament (MP) by finding their address at -ourcommons-ca -, ensuring you include your postal code to prove you are a constituent. Use a clear subject line, keep it concise (3-4 paragraphs), focus on one issue, and use a respectful tone to outline your concern and requested action.
ourcommons-ca | replace the - for a .



